The McCarran - Ferguson Act Anticompetitive or Procompetitive ?

نویسنده

  • Patricia M. Danzon
چکیده

The McCarran-Ferguson Act provides a limited exemption to the insurance industry from the federal antitrust laws. The act provides that the Sherman Act, the Clayton Act, and the Federal Trade Commission Act apply to the business of insurance "to the extent that such business is not regulated by state law." That limited exemption from federal antitrust law does not extend to "any agreement to boycott, coerce or intimidate, or act of boycott, coercion, or intimidation." The act also declares that the business of insurance shall be subject to regulation and taxation by the states. After passage of the act in 1945, all states enacted some form of rate regulation to qualify for the exemption. The practical import of the antitrust exemption has been eroded in recent years as courts have narrowed the definition of the business of insurance and broadened the definition of boycott and as an increasing number of states have subjected the industry to state antitrust law. Proposals to repeal the McCarran-Ferguson Act have been a familiar feature of the Washington scene for many years. But pressure has mounted

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Behavioral Antitrust: a New Approach to the Rule of Reason after Leegin

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., which replaced the longstanding per se rule against resale price maintenance (RPM) with a rule of reason approach, has resurrected the debate over RPM. Legal and economic proponents of this practice again point to its potential procompetitive benefits, while RPM detractors emphasize its possible anticom...

متن کامل

Antitrust enforcement encourages health care providers to cooperate procompetitively.

A review of significant administrative and judicial rulings in antitrust law during 1993 shows that the antitrust laws should not impede innovative, cost-cutting cooperative arrangements among providers, so long as their actual or potential procompetitive benefits are not outweighed by their anticompetitive effects.

متن کامل

Can Naked Exclusion Be Procompetitive?

Antitrust scholars have argued that exclusive contracts have anticompetitive, or at best neutral effects, if no efficiencies are generated. In contrast, this paper shows that exclusive contracts can have procompetitive effects, provided buyers are imperfect downstream competitors and contract breach is feasible. In that case an efficient entrant is not necessarily foreclosed through exclusive c...

متن کامل

Regulation, Competition, and Liberalization

In many countries throughout the world, regulators are struggling to determine whether and how to introduce competition into regulated industries. This essay examines the complexities involved in the liberalization process. While stressing the importance of case-specific analyses, this essay distinguishes liberalization policies that generally are procompetitive from corresponding anticompetiti...

متن کامل

The Roberts Court and the Limits of Antitrust

Numerous commentators have characterized the Roberts Court’s antitrust decisions as radical departures that betray a pro-business, anticonsumer bias. That characterization is inaccurate. Although some of the decisions do represent significant changes from past practice, the “probusiness/anti-consumer” characterization fails to appreciate the fundamental limits of antitrust, a body of law that r...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008